Helmut Marko “sides with Lewis Hamilton” on Formula 1’s jewellery ban

Helmut Marko has thrown his assistance at the rear of Lewis Hamilton in the argument with the FIA over the jewellery ban.

Although it has been in the rule e book for decades, Formulation 1’s new race director Niels Wittich introduced previously this yr the ban on drivers donning jewellery would be enforced.

Before every grand prix, the teams have to post in their scrutineering studies comments about the driver’s jewellery and also his underwear.

The Miami Grand Prix was the to start with race in which the ban was upheld, with Hamilton given a two-race exemption as some of his piercings can’t be quickly taken off.

The driver has right until Monaco to do so but has presently made it clear he will not – he feels it is a private conclusion every single driver really should make.

He extra: “When they told me about the jewellery, they said safety is all the things. And I mentioned ‘well, what is happened for the past 16 a long time? I’ve had jewelry on for 16 years, so was protection not an issue back then?””

In what may be a initial at any time, Pink Bull advisor Marko agrees with the 7-time previous World Champion.

“I assume they have gone as well significantly,” grandpx.news quotes Marko, 78, as getting advised RTL.

“This should really be a private determination of the motorists.

“I do not keep in mind how very long Hamilton has been in F1, but he has been putting on this jewelry all these yrs. So why did they instantly come to a decision to invent this subject?”

The Austrian reckons System 1 has more substantial concerns it should really be working with, drivers’ piercings and underwear not currently being on his listing.

“I believe we have sufficient other points to fear about,” he ongoing. “We need to acknowledge and respect the individuality of each and every driver.

“Do I side with Hamilton? Sure I do, and this is my truthful view.”

Wittich discussed in his pre-race notes for the Miami race the reasoning at the rear of the ban on both equally jewellery and drivers’ underwear that is not fireplace retardant.

He wrote the donning of jewellery underneath flame-resistant outfits “can lessen the safety afforded by this equipment” and “thus may maximize the threat of melt away injuries in the occasion of a fire”.

 

As for the underwear ruling, the use of “non-flameproof products in call with the driver’s skin, and in individual synthetic elements, can minimize warmth transmission defense and hence maximize the possibility of melt away accidents in the party of a fire”.